Edodo
Illustration for “Introducing EDodo Intensives: PD That Teaches the Way It Preaches”

Most teacher PD has the same shape.

Someone talks at you for a day.

You take notes. You get a certificate. You go home.

Monday comes.

Nothing changes.

I've sat through plenty of it. I've also delivered plenty of it. After 20+ years moving between elite software engineering and transformative education — 2,000+ educators trained, 50+ international schools, the previous five years as Director of Pedagogy at MasaiSchool — one thing has become unavoidable for me.

The format is broken.

Not the topics. Not the people. The container.

If you want educators to design AI-amplified classrooms, you can't do it through a six-hour PowerPoint. You can't do it with a prompt library. You definitely can't do it with a certificate that lives in a drawer.

So we're not doing that anymore.

EDodo Intensives are what we're doing instead.


What an EDodo Intensive actually is

Two parts. One certification. Built for educators who want to do the work.

Part 1: The Launchpad.

One full day. Live. Designed like a launch, not a lecture.

You walk in curious.

You walk out building.

This isn't a keynote with slides. It's a working session where you get your hands dirty alongside a team of educators who are obsessed with the same problems you are.

Part 2: The Build.

Eight weeks of asynchronous, project-based learning.

You apply what you learned in the Launchpad. You ship artifacts. You get feedback from people doing this work in classrooms all over the world.

No passive video binges. No multiple choice. No "complete-by-Sunday-or-you-fail."

You build things you can use the next day. And things you'll keep using long after the program ends.


The line that changes everything

Here's the principle behind every Intensive we run:

The core belief

People should learn from how we teach as much as from what we teach.

Read it again.

If a workshop about AI-powered learning design is delivered through dead slides and passive listening, it contradicts itself.

If a session on inquiry doesn't make participants inquire, it lied.

If a program about cognitive amplification cognitively numbs you for six hours, it broke its own promise.

The medium is the message.

So in an EDodo Intensive, every activity is itself a piece of pedagogy you can study. Every interaction is designed with the same frameworks you're learning to apply.

You don't just hear about cognitive load theory.

You feel a session designed around it.

You don't just read about transferable understanding.

You watch your own understanding transfer in real time.

That's the standard. It's non-negotiable.


Not one expert on stage. A team.

This is the part most professional development gets wrong.

The best ideas in education don't come from a single genius with a microphone. They come from a small room of practitioners who care deeply, push each other, and build together.

So every EDodo Intensive is co-created and co-led by a team of 3 to 7 educators.

A math specialist alongside a TOK coordinator alongside a tech director.

Different lenses. Shared standard.

This matters for three reasons:

  1. Participants get richer perspectives than any one of us could deliver alone.
  2. Facilitators don't burn out. No single person carrying every minute of every cohort.
  3. The work itself gets sharper. Brilliant people who disagree make better programs.

I'm not interested in being a lonely expert on a stage. I'm interested in building a faculty.


What's launching first

Two Intensives are forming teams right now.

EDodo Intensive: Transformative Mathematics with AI

This is not "use ChatGPT to make worksheets."

It's a pedagogical system for making mathematics teaching dramatically more powerful — grounded in learning science, designed for transfer, supported by AI without losing the human judgment at the center of it.

EDodo Intensive: Concept-Based Inquiry with AI

CBI is already one of the most powerful approaches in international education.

This program shows how AI can amplify it — making concept-based design more effective, more accessible, and more scalable across very different contexts.

Both programs follow the same shape. One full-day Launchpad. Eight weeks of building. A community that stays with you afterward.


How we decide what becomes an Intensive

Not every good idea becomes an EDodo Intensive.

Every program we consider has to sit in the overlap of three circles.

Circle 1: Something the team genuinely loves to teach.

If the facilitators aren't excited, the participants will feel it within ten minutes. Passion is non-negotiable.

Circle 2: Something that makes a real difference.

Not incremental improvement. Actual transformation in how educators design learning, how students think, and what schools become capable of.

Circle 3: Something schools will invest in.

Sustainable impact requires a sustainable model. Pretending otherwise just burns out good work and produces nothing that lasts.

Only ideas at the intersection of all three become Intensives.

If your idea sits in that overlap, I'd love to hear from you.


Foundation. Practitioner. Leader.

Each Intensive is offered at one of three stages.

Foundation. You're new to this area. You build core understanding and your first set of practical tools.

Practitioner. You have the basics. Now you go deeper, refine your work, and create artifacts that demonstrate mastery in actual classrooms.

Leader. You're ready to lead this work at the school or system level. Strategy. Implementation. Measurement. Change management.

This progression mirrors structures international educators already know — like IB's Category 1, 2, and 3 workshops — but pushes beyond them into sustained, project-based depth.

A Cat 1 workshop introduces you to an idea.

A Practitioner Intensive makes you fluent in it.

A Leader Intensive makes you the person other educators turn to.


Who this is for

Teachers in IB, Cambridge, AP, or any international curriculum context who are tired of tool demos and ready for system design.

Coaches and coordinators who need frameworks, not features.

Heads of department who want their teams building with AI, not just talking about it.

School leaders who know that a one-day workshop isn't enough but don't yet know what "enough" looks like.

Educators who want to actually enjoy their professional development.

That last one matters more than people admit.


Who this is NOT for

If you're collecting certificates to check a box, this isn't it.

If you want AI to automate teaching rather than amplify it, this won't help.

If you're not willing to build, share your work, and accept feedback, you'll be miserable.

EDodo Intensives are for people who do the work. Quietly disqualifying anyone who isn't is the kindest thing we can do for the cohort.


What's already happening

I keep meeting educators from places I've never been.

Math teachers in Thailand. CBI specialists in Armenia. Tech directors in Mumbai. Heads of secondary in Riyadh. Curriculum leaders in Lagos.

They didn't find EDodo through marketing.

They found us because someone in their network took our flagship course, AI-Powered Learning Design, and wouldn't shut up about it.

That course already has 150+ international school educators actively engaged. Multiple cohorts are full. Waiting lists keep growing.

Something is happening.

People who care deeply about pedagogy are quietly finding each other. The Intensives are the next container for that work.

Not hype.

Not fear.

Building.


An open invitation

If you have an idea for an Intensive that sits in the three-circle sweet spot — you love it, it transforms practice, schools will invest in it — I want to hear from you.

The best programs won't come from me.

They'll come from the community itself. From educators who see a problem, feel called to solve it, and want a small team of like-minded people to build it with.

That isn't a tagline.

That is literally how every EDodo Intensive is born.


How I measure success

A line I keep coming back to:

I measure success by what you build, not by what I teach.

Vivek M Agarwal

That's the whole philosophy in one sentence.

EDodo Intensives don't produce graduates who sat through a program.

They produce educators who built something real.

Something they use.

Something that changes how their students learn.

That's the mission.

If that sounds like the kind of work you want to be part of — as a participant, as a co-creator, or as a school partner — get in touch.

The next Intensive could be the one you build with us.


Learn more at edodo.app. Explore the flagship program at edodo.app/courses/ai-powered-learning-design.

Interested in co-creating an EDodo Intensive? Reach out. The next great program might be yours.

Did you find this article helpful?

Comments (24)

0/5000

Comments are reviewed before appearing publicly.

SM
Sophie Martin
Geneva, Switzerland4mo ago

The "medium is the message" line landed hard. I sat through three AI workshops last term that contradicted their own content the moment they started. This finally names the problem.

RK
Raj Krishnamurthy
Singapore4mo ago

Sign me up for the Mathematics Intensive. Already running.

HF
Hannah Fischer
Vienna, Austria4mo ago

I love the three-circle test. Most PD I attend fails Circle 2 — they confuse "new tool" with "real difference." Worth pinning that to every department wall.

CM
Chris Martinez
Miami, USA4mo ago

Question: how does the team-of-3-to-7 model handle disagreement on pedagogy in front of participants? In my experience, the surface harmony of solo facilitators hides a lot. Curious how you handle real disagreements live.

DO
Dr. Amara Okeke
Lagos, Nigeria4mo ago

As a Head of Secondary, the line that hit me was "School leaders who know that a one-day workshop isn't enough but don't yet know what 'enough' looks like." That's exactly where I am. The 8-week build component is what I've been looking for. Most consultants disappear the day after the workshop and the work dies. I'd rather pay more for something that actually sticks.

PS
Priya Sharma
Mumbai, India4mo ago

Took the AI-Powered Learning Design course last cohort. Can confirm the build-not-watch model is real. The artifacts I made there are still in my classroom rotation 4 months later.

LO
Liam O'Brien
Vancouver, Canada4mo ago

Honest pushback: "schools will invest in it" worries me a little. Where's the line between sustainability and gatekeeping? Hope there's scholarship/access pathways planned, not just full-fee cohorts.

MC
Mei Lin Chen
Taipei, Taiwan4mo ago

CBI specialist here. Concept-Based Inquiry with AI is exactly the program I've been waiting for. Most "AI for inquiry" content I've seen reduces inquiry to a search query. If the team behind the Intensive can hold the line on transferable understanding, I'll travel for the Launchpad.

JW
James Wilson
Chicago, USA4mo ago

Foundation → Practitioner → Leader is the right ladder. Far better than Cat 1/2/3 which can feel like a checkbox progression. Project-based depth is what we're missing.

AM
Aisha Mohammed
Dubai, UAE4mo ago

The MasaiSchool credential matters here. You've actually run a learning system that produced jobs, not just impressions. That experience shows in the design philosophy.

NP
Nadia Petrov
Moscow, Russia4mo ago

How is "build" assessed across the 8 weeks? Is there a rubric, or peer review, or just self-reflection? Asking because rigor is what makes a certificate worth defending to a school board.

YT
Yuki Tanaka
Tokyo, Japan4mo ago

Beautifully written.

TS
Tomás Silva
Lisbon, Portugal4mo ago

Saved.

DW
Dr. Marcus Webb
London, UK4mo ago

I run our school's digital learning strategy. We've burned through three "AI for educators" providers in 18 months — all demos, no depth. Reading this, I think the part that's actually rare is the "team of 3 to 7" structure. Single facilitators always optimize for their own brand, even when they don't mean to. A small faculty optimizes for the cohort. Sending this to my Head right now.

DC
Daniel Costa
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil4mo ago

The "Monday comes. Nothing changes." opening hooked me. That's every PD post-mortem I've ever sat through.

MP
Min-Jun Park
Seoul, South Korea4mo ago

Bookmarking. The Practitioner stage is where I want to enter when Mathematics Intensive opens. Do let us know how the cohort sign-up will work.

ER
Elena Rossi
Milan, Italy4mo ago

The "I measure success by what you build, not by what I teach" line is going on my office wall. I run a teacher-training program and I want every facilitator I work with to internalize this. Permission to quote with attribution?

CH
Charlotte Hughes
London, UK4mo ago

IB MYP coordinator. Would Foundation-stage Mathematics Intensive be appropriate for a department that's used AI casually but not systematically? Or would Practitioner be the right entry?

DK
David Kim
Seattle, USA4mo ago

Hard agree on the prompt-libraries-don't-work point. They're obsolete by the next model release. Frameworks aren't.

EW
Ethan Walker
Melbourne, Australia4mo ago

Heads up — the "Who this is NOT for" section is the smartest move in this whole post. Gentle disqualification protects the cohort's energy more than any vetting form ever could.

VJ
Vikram Joshi
Bangalore, India4mo ago

Just shared this in our school's senior leadership group. Three of us read it back to back. We're looking at the CBI Intensive as a whole-team enrollment — the kind of thing where four of us go through it together so the conversation doesn't die when the program ends. Is group enrollment something you support, or is it strictly individual?

FD
Fatou Diallo
Dakar, Senegal4mo ago

I'm a teacher educator working across 14 schools in West Africa. The team-of-educators model resonates because we already do this informally. What would it take for a regional cluster to co-create an Intensive specifically for low-bandwidth, multilingual classrooms? Reach out to discuss?

OB
Olivia Brown
Boston, USA4mo ago

The honesty about facilitator burnout (point 2 in the team-of-3-to-7 reasons) is unusual to read in a marketing post. Most PD providers pretend this isn't a problem. Naming it builds trust.

AM
Anika Müller
Berlin, Germany5mo ago

I have an idea that fits all three circles. Sustainability literacy + AI for primary classrooms. I've been quietly running a version of it with my own students for a year and the transfer is real. Where do I send the pitch?