All books/Gagné's Nine Events of Instruction in Action
Chapter 106 min read

Event 5: Provide Learning Guidance

How to scaffold learning with worked examples, mnemonics, analogies, and other strategies that support meaningful encoding.

The Art of Scaffolding

Presenting content is necessary but not sufficient. Learners need support to process, understand, and remember new information. This is where learning guidance enters—the strategies and tools that help learners encode content meaningfully.

The cognitive process being supported is semantic encoding—the process of making new information meaningful by connecting it to existing knowledge in ways that facilitate storage and later retrieval. Information encoded semantically (with meaning) is far more durable than information encoded only at the surface level (rote repetition).

Think of guidance as scaffolding. In construction, scaffolding provides temporary support that allows workers to reach heights they couldn't otherwise access. In learning, scaffolding provides cognitive support that allows learners to understand material that would otherwise exceed their current capabilities. As competence develops, the scaffolding is gradually removed.


Worked Examples and Non-Examples

One of the most powerful guidance strategies is the worked example—a complete, step-by-step demonstration of how an expert solves a problem or performs a task.

Why Worked Examples Work

Research on worked examples shows they reduce cognitive load during learning. Instead of struggling to simultaneously understand a concept AND figure out how to apply it, learners can focus on understanding the solution process in a complete example.

Effective Worked Example Design

  • Show the full solution with each step clearly labeled
  • Include expert thinking: What made you choose this step? What alternatives did you consider?
  • Explain the why, not just the what: "We use this approach because..."
  • Annotate: Highlight key decisions and common choice points
  • Use fading: Start with complete examples, then gradually remove steps for learners to complete

The Power of Non-Examples

Non-examples—cases that look similar but don't qualify—help learners understand boundaries and distinguish key features.

  • "This looks like a valid argument, but here's why it fails..."
  • "Students often think this is correct. Let's see why it doesn't work..."
  • "Here's what a weak CER paragraph looks like. Notice what's missing..."

Non-examples are particularly valuable for:

  • Concepts with fuzzy boundaries
  • Procedures where common errors look reasonable
  • Distinctions that experts make automatically but novices miss

Mnemonics and Memory Aids

Some information must simply be remembered—sequences, lists, formulas, definitions. Mnemonics provide encoding strategies that make memorization more efficient and retrieval more reliable.

Types of Mnemonics

Acronyms: First letters form a memorable word

  • HOMES for the Great Lakes (Huron, Ontario, Michigan, Erie, Superior)
  • PEMDAS for order of operations

Acrostics: First letters form a memorable sentence

  • "My Very Educated Mother Just Served Us Nachos" for planet order
  • "Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally" for order of operations

Method of Loci: Information placed along an imagined familiar route

Chunking: Grouping information into memorable units

  • Phone numbers grouped as 3-3-4 digits
  • Social Security numbers grouped as 3-2-4

Visual Associations: Creating vivid mental images that link items

Rhythms and Songs: Setting information to melody

When to Use Mnemonics

Mnemonics are most valuable for:

  • Arbitrary information with no inherent logic (sequences, names)
  • Information that must be recalled quickly and accurately
  • Lists where order matters
  • Prerequisites that must be automatic to support higher-level learning

They are less appropriate when understanding relationships matters more than recall, or when the mnemonic might oversimplify.


Scaffolding Strategies

Scaffolding provides temporary support that is gradually withdrawn as competence develops.

Types of Scaffolds

Procedural Scaffolds: Step-by-step guides and checklists

  • "First, do X. Then, check Y. Finally, decide Z."
  • Flowcharts for decision-making
  • Templates that structure the task

Conceptual Scaffolds: Frameworks for understanding

  • Graphic organizers showing relationships
  • Advance organizers previewing structure
  • Worked examples showing expert approaches

Strategic Scaffolds: Guidance on how to approach problems

  • "When you see this type of problem, first check for..."
  • Self-questioning prompts: "Ask yourself: What's the main idea?"
  • Metacognitive reminders: "Stop here and verify your answer makes sense"

Social Scaffolds: Support from peers or instructors

  • Partner work where stronger learners assist others
  • Think-alouds by instructor showing reasoning
  • Structured peer feedback protocols

The Fading Process

Effective scaffolding follows a progression:

  1. Full support: Complete worked examples, detailed checklists, heavy guidance
  2. Partial support: Incomplete examples for learners to finish, abbreviated checklists
  3. Minimal support: Prompts and reminders only
  4. Independence: Learners perform without scaffolds

Rushing this progression creates brittle learning; prolonging it creates dependence.


Analogies and Connections

Analogies connect unfamiliar concepts to familiar ones, leveraging existing schemas to accelerate understanding.

Effective Analogies

  • "The cell membrane is like a security guard at a building entrance—it controls what gets in and out"
  • "Think of RAM like a desk and the hard drive like a filing cabinet"
  • "Compound interest is like a snowball rolling downhill—it picks up more snow as it goes"

Designing Good Analogies

  • Match structural features: The analogy should mirror the key relationships in the new concept
  • Acknowledge limitations: "This analogy works for X, but breaks down when we get to Y"
  • Build from learner's world: Use references that learners actually know
  • Be concrete: Physical, tangible analogies work better than abstract ones

Limitations of Analogies

Analogies can mislead when learners take them too literally or extend them beyond their valid scope. Always be explicit about where the analogy stops working.


Context-Specific Examples

Corporate Training (Compliance)

Anti-money laundering regulations guidance:

  • Analogy: "Think of money laundering like trying to clean a dirty penny by mixing it in with clean ones"
  • Downloadable job aid: Checklist of "red flags"
  • Decision tree: "When should you escalate? Follow this flowchart"
  • Worked example: Complete case analysis showing expert reasoning

K-12 English (6th Grade)

Essay structure guidance:

  • Analogy: The "hamburger" essay (top bun = intro, patties = body paragraphs, bottom bun = conclusion)
  • Scaffold: Fill-in-the-blank graphic organizer for first essay
  • Worked example: Annotated model paragraph with color-coded elements
  • Non-example: Weak paragraph with missing elements labeled

eLearning (Technical)

Coding course guidance:

  • Code library of common functions to reference
  • "Smart tips" pop-ups explaining why code works
  • Commented code examples showing best practices
  • Error gallery: Common bugs and their fixes

Higher Education (Anatomy)

Cranial nerves guidance:

  • Mnemonic: "On Old Olympus' Towering Top, A Finn And German Viewed Some Hops"
  • Detailed anatomical diagrams with labels
  • Practice app for spaced retrieval
  • Non-examples: Conditions where nerve function is impaired

Key Takeaways

  • Guidance supports semantic encoding—making new information meaningful through connections.
  • Worked examples reduce cognitive load by showing complete solutions before learners attempt problems.
  • Non-examples help learners understand boundaries and avoid common errors.
  • Mnemonics are powerful for information that must be memorized but lack inherent logic.
  • Scaffolding provides temporary support that is gradually withdrawn as competence develops.
  • Analogies accelerate understanding by connecting new concepts to familiar ones—but acknowledge their limitations.
  • The goal is not permanent dependence on supports but confident independent performance.