Event 7: Provide Feedback

The Learning Loop Completes

Practice without feedback is incomplete learning. Without information about performance quality, learners cannot distinguish correct from incorrect understanding, effective from ineffective approaches, or progress from stagnation.

Feedback is not merely evaluation—it's guidance. The cognitive process being supported is reinforcement—the mechanism by which correct understanding is confirmed and strengthened, while misconceptions are identified and corrected. When feedback confirms correct performance, neural pathways are reinforced. When feedback corrects errors, the brain can remap toward accuracy.

This event is inextricably linked to Event 6 (Elicit Performance). Together, they form a tight loop that constitutes the heart of active learning. Practice generates performance; feedback shapes that performance toward mastery. Without feedback, practice may simply reinforce errors.

---

Characteristics of Effective Feedback

Not all feedback is equally useful. Research on feedback reveals specific characteristics that maximize learning impact.

Timely

The closer feedback comes to the performance, the more effective it is. When feedback is immediate, the learner's thought process is still fresh in working memory. They can directly connect their action to the outcome. Delayed feedback loses this connection—learners may not even remember why they made a particular choice.

• Immediate: "You forgot to check the safety before proceeding—did you notice the warning light was on?"
• Delayed: "Your score was 3/5. Review the module on safety procedures."

The immediate feedback provides actionable information while the experience is fresh.

Specific

Vague feedback provides little learning value. "Good job" tells learners nothing about what was good. "Needs improvement" gives no direction for how to improve.

• Vague: "Your analysis was weak."
• Specific: "Your analysis identified the correct problem, but didn't address the root cause. Look for factors that explain why the immediate cause occurred."

Specific feedback answers the implicit question: "What exactly should I do differently?"

Corrective, Not Just Evaluative

Evaluative feedback tells learners whether they were right or wrong. Corrective feedback guides them toward the right answer or approach.

• Evaluative only: "Incorrect. The answer is B."
• Corrective: "Not quite. You selected an answer that works for simple cases, but this problem involves a compound variable. When you see compound variables, what approach do you use?"

Corrective feedback preserves the learning opportunity rather than simply ending it.

Focused on Performance, Not Person

Feedback should address what the learner did, not who the learner is. Person-focused feedback ("You're not good at this") triggers defensive responses and undermines motivation. Performance-focused feedback ("This approach didn't account for the exception cases") keeps attention on improvement.

Constructive and Kind

Feedback that humiliates or discourages shuts down learning. Effective feedback maintains learner dignity while still being honest about performance gaps. The goal is improvement, not punishment.

---

Types of Feedback

Different situations call for different feedback types:

Evaluative Feedback

Tells learners about the accuracy of their response.

• "That's correct."
• "Your calculation is accurate."
• "Yes, that's exactly the right approach."

Evaluative feedback is necessary but insufficient alone. It confirms or disconfirms but doesn't guide.

Remedial Feedback

Guides learners toward the correct answer without giving it away directly.

• "Not quite. Look again at the section on liability."
• "You're on the right track, but consider what happens when X is negative."
• "Think about the third step in the process—what comes before the final verification?"

Remedial feedback keeps learners thinking rather than simply correcting them.

Descriptive/Analytic Feedback

Offers specific analysis and suggestions for improvement.

• "Your opening was strong—it grabbed attention immediately. The middle section wandered. Try connecting each paragraph back to your thesis statement."
• "Your diagnosis was correct, but your reasoning jumped too quickly to the conclusion. In clinical practice, you'd want to document the elimination of other possibilities first."

Descriptive feedback is most useful for complex performances where many dimensions can vary.

Peer Feedback

Structured opportunities for learners to provide feedback to each other. When well-designed, peer feedback:

• Forces the reviewer to articulate criteria for quality
• Provides multiple perspectives on performance
• Increases feedback volume beyond what instructors alone can provide
• Develops critical thinking skills

Self-Assessment Feedback

Using rubrics, checklists, or models to evaluate one's own work. Self-assessment develops metacognitive skills and reduces dependence on external feedback.

---

Timing and Volume

Immediate vs. Delayed

For most learning situations, immediate feedback is preferable. However, some research suggests that for certain complex tasks, slightly delayed feedback may promote deeper processing. The key principle: feedback should come while the learner can still connect it to their thought process.

Quantity

More feedback is not always better. Overwhelming learners with extensive feedback on every dimension of performance can cause:

• Cognitive overload
• Discouragement
• Inability to prioritize what to work on

Focus feedback on 1-3 key points. Prioritize the most important issues that will have the greatest impact on performance.

---

Feedback in Different Contexts

Real-Time Performance (Live Instruction)

• Instructor circulates during practice, providing individual feedback
• "I see you've set up the equation correctly. Now, what's your next step?"
• Brief, targeted comments that guide without taking over

Asynchronous (eLearning)

• Automated feedback built into interactions
• "Correct! The STAR system reduces paperwork, which saves time."
• "Not quite. The correct answer is B. While the system is new, its main benefit is reducing paperwork, not increasing leads."
• Include explanation of why correct answers are correct and why incorrect answers are wrong

Complex Performances (Writing, Projects)

• Written feedback using track changes or comments
• Rubric-based feedback addressing multiple dimensions
• Audio or video feedback for more personal connection
• Focus on patterns rather than every individual error

---

Context-Specific Examples

Corporate Training (Customer Service)

During a role-play on de-escalation:

• "That was a good start with the empathy statement. Next time, try asking an open-ended question after they finish venting. Something like 'Help me understand what would make this right for you' keeps them engaged and gives you information."
• Immediate, specific, corrective, and includes a concrete suggestion.

K-12 Math (4th Grade)

During independent practice:

• Teacher circulates and looks at student work
• "You've set up the problem perfectly. Now remember—when we subtract, we start with which column?"
• "I see you're stuck on this one. What's the first step we talked about?"
• Guides without doing the work for them.

eLearning (Software Simulation)

After learner clicks wrong button:

• "Not quite. Remember, new projects are always started from the 'File' menu. The button you clicked is for opening existing projects."
• Try again prompt allows immediate correction.

Higher Education (Nursing Clinical)

After a skills demonstration:

• "Your technique for the insertion was textbook-perfect. I noticed you didn't verify the patient's identity verbally before the procedure. In practice, what could happen if you skip that step?"
• Acknowledges what was correct while addressing the critical gap.

Writing Feedback (Any Level)

Using a structured approach:

1. Start with genuine strength: "Your opening hook is compelling—it made me want to keep reading."
2. Identify the priority improvement: "Your main argument gets lost in the middle paragraphs. Try adding a topic sentence to each paragraph that connects back to your thesis."
3. Ask a thinking question: "What do you want the reader to feel after the conclusion?"

---

Common Feedback Mistakes

Mistake: Feedback Overload

Marking every error on a paper, resulting in a sea of red.

Fix: Focus on 2-3 patterns. "I've marked examples of your two most important areas for revision. Focus on these before addressing smaller issues."

Mistake: Vague Praise

"Great work!" "Excellent job!" without specificity.

Fix: "Your use of evidence was strong—you cited three specific sources and explained how each supported your argument."

Mistake: Delayed Feedback on Simple Tasks

Returning a quiz a week later when immediate correction would have been valuable.

Fix: For knowledge and skill practice, provide feedback immediately. Use technology or peer review to scale this.

Mistake: Person-Focused Criticism

"You don't understand variables at all."

Fix: Focus on the performance: "This approach works when there's one variable but breaks down with multiple variables. Let's look at what changes are needed."

Mistake: No Opportunity to Use Feedback

Providing feedback but no chance to try again.

Fix: Feedback should lead to another attempt whenever possible. Learning happens in the revision.

---

Key Takeaways

• Feedback completes the practice loop—without it, practice may reinforce errors.
• The cognitive process is reinforcement—confirming correct understanding, correcting misconceptions.
• Effective feedback is timely, specific, corrective, and kind.
• Different types (evaluative, remedial, descriptive) serve different purposes.
• Focus feedback on 1-3 priority areas; avoid overwhelming learners.
• When possible, feedback should lead to another attempt, not end the learning opportunity.
• The goal of feedback is improvement, not judgment.